It’s kind of funny, really. In 2022, Atlanta Motor Speedway repaved its track so it would be more like Daytona, becoming a mini-superspeedway, if you will. It couldn’t be a true superspeedway because at a mile-and-a-half, it’s not as big as Daytona and Talladega.
Mostly, it added banking to produce the long lines of cars that went round and round until somebody got out of shape and caused a big wreck, just like Daytona and Talladega. Actual racing? Again, just like Daytona and Talladega, there wasn’t much of that.
Until the summer race this July. In a totally unexpected development, drivers and race teams found the track had changed its character. I was nothing like what had been going on the past few years, including the spring race this February.
The track surface was worn, and the cars lost grip. Some teams’ set-ups were better able to take advantage of the change in downforce than others, but the long lines didn’t form because at a certain point, everybody was unstable. They couldn’t reach the high speeds produced by drafting one another usually seen on superspeedways where slower cars were pulled along at the same speed as the faster ones. Now, there were small groups of cars, and if a faster car got a good run it could pull out of line and pass a slower car in front of it and then get back in line. There was real racing for a change.
NASCAR saw that and, to its credit, put together a committee to see if it couldn’t come up with some changes that would create better racing at Daytona. In effect, whereas Atlanta had wanted to become Daytona, now Daytona wanted to become Atlanta.
The curing of the track had produced improved competition at Atlanta naturally, but Daytona was a different animal. So NASCAR came up with some rule changes. It lowered the rear spoiler from seven to four inches and cut horsepower from roughly 550 to 450.
The high spoiler trapped air flowing over and around the car, pushing it into the track and creating downforce. By lowering the spoiler, the cars wouldn’t stick as well and by lowering horsepower, it was harder to close on the car in front and take advantage of the draft, keeping the cars farther apart. The changes were supposed to keep the pack pace steady while adding 3 m.p.h. to cars pulling out to make a single car run.
It was a good idea except for one thing: it didn’t work. Like so many things that look good on paper in NASCAR, when theories were put into practice the results were not what was expected. The long lines quickly formed up again and anybody that pulled out to pass without another line of cars forming behind him was quickly shuffled to the back of the pack.
The one positive, at least early in the race, was that because they weren’t running nose-to-tail, if something happened the cars had enough maneuverability to prevent the big wreck. But in the end, it was a typical superspeedway mess. With Zane Smith leading on the last lap coming to the finish, he was bumped by Tyler Reddick, hit the wall, the big wreck was on and Ryan Preece, who had never won a NASCAR race in 249 starts and may never win another one, snuck home with the win.
“I think it was a great job by NASCAR and the whole team, you know, coming up with something different here,” Denny Hamlin, a member of the committee that came up with the rule changes, said on USA Sports. “There definitely was a change,” Hamlin continued. “The cars felt a little different. I didn’t think it was quite as logjammed as it was in the past. If you wanted to get to the front I felt like you could.”
However, the general consensus seemed to be that not much was different, and some thought the new rules made things worse. Speaking to the Daytona Beach News-Journal, Hamlin’s teammate, Christopher Bell, was highly critical of the racing on the track.
“Even with the lower downforce, there were no holes (to get into), there was no bubble (the air compressed by a trailing car closing on the car in front) to separate the cars, which meant there were no places to slide into,” Bell said.
“I don’t know. I expected it to be a lot different,” Bell continued. “There wasn’t a difference at all and it was worse with the fuel mileage and stage lengths we had tonight (Saturday).”
“Honestly, I could not tell a difference,” Brad Keselowski told NASCAR.com. “I couldn’t tell they changed the rules at all. My car drove almost identical to what it did (last year). I was shocked by that,” Keselowski continued. “I thought it would drive poorly (have less downforce), particularly here in the summer.
“I was caught off guard by that,” Keselowski said. “I don’t expect it to be much different at Talladega,” he added. “The car was pretty forgiving, maybe a little bit harder to build a run to push (get to the bumper of the car ahead of you) but it was not dramatic. The handling, I think we all thought handling would be a bigger factor than it was,” he said. “It really didn’t come into play.”
Oh well. Nice try NASCAR.
NASCAR NOTESp
Three most likely winners at Darlington Sunday: 1-Denny Hamlin, 2-Tyler Reddick, 3-Christopher Bell. Last year’s winner of the Cook Out Southern 500 at Darlington: Chase Briscoe. Top five in Cook Out Southern 500 last year: 1-Briscoe, 2-Reddick, 3-Erik Jones, 4-John Hunter Nemechek, 5-Justin Allgaier.
Last week’s Old Guy Sport picks: The OGS competition index does not score races at NASCAR’s three superspeedways, Atlanta, Daytona and Talladega. Last week’s race was at Daytona.
Top 10 in OGS competition index after 21 races: 1-Hamlin 565, 2-Bell 391, 3-Reddick 344, 4-Briscoe 312, 5-Ty Gibbs 295, 6-Kyle Larson 283, 7-Ryan Blaney 280, 8-Shane van Gisbergen 226, 9-Joey Logano 208, 10-Chase Elliott 192.
OGS competition index top 10 on intermediate tracks (tracks most like Darlington: 1-Hamlin 419, 2-Reddick 232, 3-Bell 212, 4-Briscoe 147, 5-Larson 129, 6-Elliott 120, 7-William Byron 99, 8-Corey Heim 78, 9-Brad Keselowski 63, 10-Carson Hocevar, Daniel Suarez 51.
