Select Page

The brotherhood

The game was sluggish from the start, like two heavyweights trying to land punches with their feet stuck in cement.
South Florida had eked out a 10-7 halftime lead, but there was no indication that would stand up, not against a Boise State team which is considered the Alabama of the Group of Five, had just been in the College Football Playoffs and had everyone wondering how long it would take before it asserted its dominance.
Maybe now, midway through the third quarter with USF in a punting situation, fourth-and-6 at the Boise 45, the Broncos would take control. Out came the USF punt team. The ball was snapped and then something unexpected happened.
The punter was not the punter. Instead, it was freshman quarterback Locklan Hewlett, a player of much promise but not someone who figured prominently for the Bulls this year.
And Hewlett did not punt. Instead, he looked downfield, where USF’s Keyshaun Singleton had gotten behind the Boise defense and was streaking toward the end zone. Hewlett lofted the ball. Down the field it flew, into the waiting arms of Singleton, who grabbed it and took it in for a score.
And just like that, it was USF 17, Boise 7. On the sidelines, Byrum Brown knew. “As soon as he (Hewlett) threw it, I started running toward the (end) zone,” Brown said according to the USF football website. This was a game changer. It would wake up the dormant USF offense; Brown would wake up the dormant USF offense.
Brown would be the guy of whom Boise coach Spencer Danielson said “he will be one of the best football players we see all year, on either side of the ball. I’m not just talking about being one of the best quarterbacks we will see, he’s one of the best football players we will see during the 2025 season,” Danielson emphasized.
The fake punt was, no doubt, the biggest play of the game. It invigorated USF, gave it a fresh rush of adrenalin which woke up the offense and let it overwhelm Boise.
It could be the biggest play of the year if USF capitalizes on the opportunity it created. With the win, USF now has a legitimate path to the CFP; not an easy path, but a legitimate one no matter what happens against Florida and Miami.
And, if USF can pull that off, get to the playoffs, then it could arguably be the biggest play in USF history.
For the last two years under Coach Alex Golesh, USF has been a dormant volcano. There has been some smoke and fire, a lot of rumbling, enough going on to grab your attention while Golesh put his plan in place, but no real eruption.
He has stressed believing in the process, that this team’s ability to move up the football ladder depends not only in believing in themselves but believing in what they can do as a team, independent of the coaches’ urging. The players must lead, not the coaches. The coaches are there to guide the process and install the system.
“I’ve said it ad nauseam to our team, until it becomes player driven it will not break out and I felt like tonight (Thursday) it was truly player driven,” Golesh said.
“Ultimately, when you truly believe in each other you truly have a brotherhood which is really, really hard to do in college football right now,” Golesh said.
“You’re going to play for the guy next to you and you don’t want to let him down. They’ve (his players) bought into that, they’ve worked that way,” Golesh commented. “I thought we were physically ready, I thought we were mentally ready and we put it all together tonight (Thursday).”
“It’s a new standard, a new expectation (for this team),” Brown declared. “This ain’t the same old South Florida anymore.” Hey there up in Gainesville, you hear that?

The big game, and it’s not Texas-Ohio State, at least not in Tampa

Boise State has been so good for so long nobody can remember when they were bad – if they ever were. Boise is the Alabama of the Group of Five, the conferences just a notch below the Power Four. If you beat Boise, you have to be really good or really lucky or maybe a little bit of both.
In what will be arguably the most important game South Florida has ever played, the Bulls are going to try and take down Boise in their opener in Tampa Thursday.
This is big. Win this, and you give yourself a chance to go all the way, and by all the way we mean you have a shot at the College Football Playoffs. There’s no guarantee, of course. You still have to beat Memphis. And Navy. And some think Florida Atlantic will be sneaky good. But you have a shot.
Because the highest ranked team from the Group of Five gets an automatic bid to the CFP, and if you beat Boise, you’re in position to be that team. Remember Boise, 11-1 during the regular season last year with only a 37-34 last minute loss to Oregon staining its record, was the Group of Five’s rep in 2024.
So, if you’re USF and you can somehow win this game, you jump start your chances even if you lose to Miami and Florida. But you have to finish, as USF Coach Alex Golesh likes to put it (Boise’s Spencer Danielson says the same thing about his team).
“They had six games going into the fourth quarter that were one score games,” Golesh said. “They know how to finish, and that’s what it takes to win.” Golesh says the Bulls, who have never been in this position before, will be ready. “We’re locked in to the task at hand,” Golesh said according to USF’s football website. “For us it’s a huge challenge, and what we have to do to be successful is play really, really good football.
“We have to play really hard for four quarters and I bring up that fourth quarter stat because this (Boise) is a team that is used to going into the fourth quarter and finishing football games.”
Indeed they are. But one interesting aspect to this game is that Boise State seems to view it as just as critical to its success as USF does, which shows the respect Danielson has for the Bulls.
“Who ever wins this game it’s not gonna be the team who has the most emotion, it’s going to be the team who executes,” Danielson declared according to Boise’s football website.
And both these coaches are big on “process.” Golesh has been all about that since the day he got here and if anything he stresses it more now. “We’re process driven and I’ve hammered that home,” he declared. “Our preparation is the same no matter who you’re playing.”
“We want to have the best process in the country,” Danielson said. “As a coach that’s what we control. To me, I want to make sure we’re preparing our players to be their best. I want to make sure they have everything they need to be successful.”
Besides sticking to the process and finishing in the fourth quarter, there is an X-factor in this game that could decide it, and that’s USF quarterback Byrum Brown. Going into this season, Brown has most definitely been underrated because of the injury plagued season he had in 2024.
But he’s not underrated by Danielson. “Their quarterback, No. 17, Brown, he will be one of the best football players we see all year on either side of the ball,” Danielson declared. “I’m not just talking about one of the best quarterbacks we’ll see, he’s one of the best football players we will see during the 2025 season.
“I have a ton of respect for him,” Danielson continued. “I’ve done a lot of research on him over the summertime, getting to know more about him. Man, I’ve got a lot of respect for the young man, his character, how he leads,” Danielson said.
“He gets a lot of credit for how he runs the ball – which he should. He can make every throw. He’s big and strong. He’s an NFL quarterback. We’ll see him play on Sundays here soon; he’s earned that,” Danielson commented.
“He’s a leader; how he speaks, he grabs your attention in his interviews. We’ve got our hands full with 17,” Danielson remarked.
And USF will have its hands full with Boise, which is why this game will be in the national spotlight. Upstart USF against been there, done that Boise State.
“The big thing for us is that we get to do it (play) on a national stage and that’s awesome for us as we continue to build our brand, our football program,” Golesh said. “It’s the next opportunity to put it on display.”
Indeed it is. Just don’t screw it up.
PAT’S PICKS: Boise over USF-USF has Brown, and he may be up to the task. But Boise has Power Four-type talent. They’re a proven commodity and used to playing – and winning – big games.
Florida over Long Island U-Are you kidding me?
Alabama over FSU-Look out for this one. This is not your father’s Alabama and Kalen DeBoer is definitely not Nick Saban and FSU is definitely better than last year. Maybe a lot better.
Notre Dame over Miami-Miami paid Carson Beck more than $4 million to come play for then. If Beck was that good Georgia would have kept him.
UCF over Jacksonville State-UCF was a disappointment in the Big 12 and Scott Frost was a disappointment at Nebraska (after leaving UCF) and if the Knights lose this one it will be more than a disappointment. It will be a disaster.

Penske wins titles, but are they really the champs?

Late Saturday, after his two-lap charge to the finish gave him the win in Daytona’s Coke Zero Sugar 400, Ryan Blaney was being compared to Dale Earnhardt as a superspeedway racer.
Now Blaney is a better driver then he is credited with, but comparing him to Earnhardt is like comparing Team Penske to the other two heavyweights in NASCAR, Joe Gibbs Racing and Hendrick Motorsports. It can’t be done.
This despite the fact that Penske has won three straight NASCAR championships and could steal a fourth this year; all four of its drivers, Blaney, Joey Logano (who won in 2024), Austin Cindric and the Wood Brothers entry, Josh Berry, have qualified for the playoffs. The Wood Brothers have a technical alliance with Penske and are its defacto fourth car.
You have to say “steal” because NASCAR’s playoffs are not structured to determine a true champion. There are 16 drivers in the playoffs and 12 of them will be eliminated in the next nine events, leaving four to contend for the title in the last race at Phoenix.
Every three races, the four drivers with the lowest point totals get cut. The safest way to make sure you don’t get cut is to win one of the three races in each stage.
According to the Old Guy Sport competition index, there are five drivers who have separated themselves from the rest this year, Denny Hamlin, Kyle Larson, Chase Briscoe, William Byron and Christopher Bell.
And, if there were no playoff and the driver with the most points at the end of the season was declared the winner, one of those five would almost certainly take home the title.
Even using the NASCAR system, which rewards finishing races and not competing in them, Byron (1st), Larson (3rd), Bell (5th), Hamlin (6th) and Briscoe (8th) would be among the top contenders.
But that really doesn’t matter, because you don’t need to accumulate points to make the playoffs, all you have to do is win one race. That’s how Berry and Cindric made it, even though you can make a strong case that neither one belongs.
And that means Cindric, although he has never been competitive at the Cup level, could conceivably be the 2025 NASCAR champion. Admittedly he’s the longest of long shots; To advance he would likely have to win a race in each of the playoff’s three segments and then be the highest finisher among the final four at Phoenix, but the way the rules are he has a chance.
Cindric, though, has only won three races in his entire career, so the odds on him winning three in the last 10 this year are…well, you figure it out. Maybe a billion to one.
But it can be done, because Penske drivers have been doing it over the last couple years. That’s how they get their championships. “I think our focus is to control what we can control and try and get results on the table,” Jonathan Hassler, Penske’s president of NASCAR operations, commented after Blaney’s Daytona win according to NASCAR’s website.
“I certainly don’t feel like we have to come out and set the world on fire,” Hassler continued. “We’ve obviously got some playoff points in the bank, so we’ve kind of got to balance – it’s definitely a time of year where you’ve got to balance trying to be better with just getting base hits and moving on.”
That’s a strategy that seems to work for Penske, proving once again that under the NASCAR system, you don’t have to be the best to be the best.
PLAYOFF PICKS
First four out: Shane van Gisbergen-Only wins on road courses. There are no road courses in the first three playoff races. Josh Berry-The Wood Brothers are not competitive and he drives for the Wood Brothers. First Penske car out. Austin Dillon-Won at Richmond, which was basically the only time he’s been competitive all year. Austin Cindric-Another Penske driver who has never been competitive on any kind of track; well, he’s lucked out on superspeedways once in a while.
Second four out: Tyler Reddick-In a funk all year. Has had some success on road courses but hasn’t performed on ovals. Joey Logano-Once considered Penske’s top driver but at 35, he may have peaked. Still has a little juice on intermediate tracks, but only a little. Ross Chastain-The only place he’s run well is on intermediate tracks, not competitive anywhere else and has fallen off badly this summer. Chase Elliott-Once the leader in the Hendrick garage, has given way to Kyle Larson and William Byron. Has run decently on road courses but doesn’t seem as committed as he once was.
Last four out: Alex Bowman-Has always been the weak link at Hendrick. Hasn’t shown any real improvement this year; continues to struggle on ovals but Hendrick execs like him. Why? Kyle Larson-May be the most talented driver in the sport but he just hasn’t been the same since a miserable performance while running the Indy-Charlotte double. Christopher Bell-Bell made a big splash early and was arguably the most competitive driver in NASCAR through the early part of the season. Then he just disappeared.
And the champion is-Denny Hamlin. Beats out Ryan Blaney, Williams Byron and Chase Briscoe in the last race.
NASCAR NOTES
Most likely winners at Darlington: 1-Denny Hamlin, 2-Kyle Larson, 3-Ryan Blaney. Last year’s winner at Darlington (second race): Chase Briscoe. Top five in second race last year: 1-Briscoe, 2-Kyle Busch, 3-Christopher Bell, 4-Larson, 5-Ross Chastain.
Last week’s Old Guy Sport picks: No picks, race at Daytona. OGS does not count races at superspeedways (Daytona, Atlanta and Talladega) in its standings.
OGS competition index top 10 after 21 races: 1-Hamlin 470, 2-Larson 366, 3-Briscoe 328, 4-William Byron 326, Bell 326, 6-Shane van Gisbergen 295, 7-Blaney 293, 8-Bubba Wallace 160, 9-Alex Bowman 158, 10-Chase Elliott 147.
OGS competition index top 10 on intermediate tracks (tracks most like Darlington) 1-Hamlin 239, 2-Larson 229, 3-Blaney 199, 4-Byron 186, 5-Briscoe 157, 6-Wallace 117, 7-Chastain 102, 8-Logano 79, 9-Bell 71, 10-Bowman 64, Chris Buescher 64.

Selmon shaped USF’s football program

If you had to use one word to describe Lee Roy Selmon, that word would be “genuine.” No matter the circumstances, no matter how bright the spotlight, Selmon always was who he was. There was no pretense about him.
It is a cliche, but Selmon was larger than life. Although he was exceptional in many ways, it was how he presented himself, how he was able to direct attention away from himself to others, that set him apart.
We were reminded of that again this month when the University of South Florida decided to remember him by giving his number to the defensive lineman who best exemplified his personal and physical attributes.
“This will be a great way to carry on the legacy of Lee Roy Selmon,” USF Coach Alex Golesh commented according to the school’s football website. “It’s really a neat deal for USF. The number 63 will signify someone who has worked and shown a level of integrity, athletic ability and academic excellence, all the traits I’ve heard about since I’ve got here that defined Lee Roy Selmon,” Golesh said.
Selmon, of course, had a major impact on South Florida football. He was hired by then athletic director Paul Griffin in 1993 primarily to get the program started and helped guide it through its formative years.
Selmon worked with Jim Leavitt, USF’s first – and most successful – coach, and because he was extremely influential in the Tampa Bay community, he became the driving force behind the effort to get the first football facilities built.
When Leavitt took the job, South Florida had nothing. No offices. No locker room. Not even a practice field. Leavitt, in fact, found a goal post under the soccer stadium grandstand and had it set up so the team could work out.
Leavitt’s office was a cramped trailer that had two partitions, one for him and one for his receptionist. This was a program that literally had to be built from the ground up, and without Selmon, it would have been much more difficult. In many ways, Selmon was the glue that held things together.
In 2001 though, things started to unravel. First, Griffin was fired after covering up a complaint of racial bias made against USF’s women’s basketball coach.
That led to Selmon being elevated to athletic director, a move that gave South Florida football immediate credibility. Selmon was tremendously respected in both the collegiate and pro football community, and we can only speculate on how that would have impacted USF had he continued on in the job.
For one thing, Selmon’s approach was almost the direct opposite of Griffin’s.
Griffin was a dynamo, pushing the athletic department to expand at a rapid pace. Perhaps because of his experience at the highest level of collegiate football; Selmon played at Oklahoma and was on two national championship teams there, he understood what was needed to compete. And he saw first hand how difficult it was to build something from nothing when he was with the Bucs.
So, Selmon was more conservative than Griffin. He wanted the program to move forward; on Selmon’s watch, USF jumped first to Conference USA and then to the Big East, but he wanted to make sure USF was ready to make the move when it happened.
And then there was the dismissal of Leavitt. Selmon wasn’t directly involved in this, he retired at the end of 2004 for undisclosed health reasons, but there is no question that had he still been in charge it might never have happened.
Selmon was succeeded as AD by Doug Woolard, who had nominal control of the football program. However, after taking the team to three straight bowls in 2005, 2006 and 2007 plus starting out 6-0 with wins over nationally ranked Auburn and West Virginia and being voted No. 2 in the polls that same year, Leavitt had the bit in his teeth.
This was his program and he would run it his way. He was in charge. That changed in 2009, when Leavitt grabbed a USF player by the throat and slapped him at halftime during a game with Louisville. The school investigated, Leavitt tried to interfere with the investigation and he was fired. That sent USF into a mire of mediocrity from which it hasn’t yet recovered.
Had Selmon still been at USF, none of this might have happened. Woolard couldn’t control Leavitt; Selmon could. Like everyone else, Leavitt deferred to Selmon. Selmon’s quiet demeanor gave him an aura of authority that commanded respect. Leavitt would have coached the team but Selmon would have been in charge of the program.
Where ever he has been, Selmon made his mark in his own, unique way. What ever he did, whether it was playing football, working in the community or advocating for a cause, nobody did it better. And as USF – and others – have found out, you can get some one to take his place, but you can’t replace him.

RCR: Still spinning its wheels

It wasn’t always like this. Richard Childress Racing wasn’t always scrambling to win a race here and there, wasn’t always living more on its reputation than its performance.
Back then, Dale Earnhardt made a difference. He was larger than life during his time at RCR with his 67 wins, six championships and get-the-hell-out-of-my-way driving style. If Earnhardt’s iconic black No. 3 wasn’t feared when it took to the track, it was darn well respected.
But those days are long gone, and so is Earnhardt and so is the competitiveness that separated RCR from the pack. Now, it’s part of the pack, struggling to break out, to regain its identity. For the most part, it hasn’t been successful, and despite Austin Dillon’s win at Richmond last week, the road ahead doesn’t look any easier.
It’s a team trapped in the past, haunted by Earnhardt’s ghost. The gap between RCR and NASCAR’s big three, Joe Gibbs Racing, Hendrick and Penske, is not narrowing and looks to be getting wider. Childress keeps shuffling the pieces but they are basically the same pieces that didn’t work before and rearranging them isn’t going to make them work now.
There is a saying in NASCAR to the effect that if you’re not getting better, you’re getting worse. That simply means that if you’re content to keep on doing the things that are working for you now, you’re not improving and others will pass you.
That seems to be what’s happened at RCR. Kevin Harvick, who took over as RCR’s lead driver following the death of Earnhardt, won 23 races in 13 years there. Harvick kept the team from collapsing, but it fell behind the big three.
When Harvick left RCR to join Stewart-Haas in 2014. his career took off. At the time, led by Stewart and his crew chief, Greg Zipadelli, S-H ranked with Gibbs, Hendrick and Penske as one of NASCAR’s Power 4.
Unlike RCR, it was innovative and aggressive and with S-H backing, Harvick became one of the top competitors in the sport, something that never would have happened had he stayed at RCR. Over his 10 years with S-H, he won 37 races and a championship.
RCR, meanwhile, became mired in mediocrity, stuck in the past. It became very much an ingrown operation, with Childress bringing in his grandson, Dillon, as the lead driver because the couldn’t get anybody else. Although he had been successful at lower levels, hiring Dillon further tarnished RCR’s image.
“Austin has earned his way from the time we put him in a Bandolero car,” Childress said as reported on NASCAR’s media site after the Richmond race. “I said you guys (Austin and his brother Ty Dillon) have to earn your way.
“He (Austin) went out and won a truck championship. He went out and won an xfinity championship. He’s won races in everything he’s ever driven,” Childress declared.
And to be fair, Dillon has won six races at RCR. While that doesn’t compare with NASCAR’s big boys, it’s a solid number for a tier two team, and RCR is now a tier two team.
At that level only Kyle Busch with 63 wins, Brad Keselowski with 36 and Tyler Reddick with eight have more among current drivers, and 60 of Busch’s wins came when he was with two of the top teams in the sport, four with Hendrick and 56 with Gibbs.
Keselowski has a similar record, with 34 of his 36 coming when he was with Penske.
Only Reddick, who drove briefly for Childress before jumping to the up-and-coming 23XI team, has all his wins at a tier two level. So, if you subtract Busch and Keselowski’s wins with elite teams, Reddick has the most in tier two with eight and Dillon is next with six. Busch would have three and Keselowski 2.
This, though, only masks how bad things have gotten at RCR. Even with Busch as its lead driver; he came on board in 2023 after he couldn’t work out a new contract with Gibbs, RCR has yet to get a handle on NASCAR’s Next Gen car, which debuted in 2022.
Busch won three races for RCR in 2023 but is currently on an 82 race winless streak. He’s 40, and his best years are behind him, but put him in a winning car and he can still win; RCR just doesn’t build winning cars.
The Old Guy Sport competition index, which measures competitiveness on the track as opposed to the NASCAR point system which is based on simply finishing races, shows how far RCR has fallen.
Disregarding superspeedway races (Atlanta, Daytona and Talladega), which tell you nothing about the driver or the team because avoiding the big wreck and being in the right lane at the right time determine the winner, Dillon currently has 64 points in the OGS competition index, and 63 came in the Richmond race.
Busch has only 38 points and has been competitive in only two races, both road courses. Truth be told, Busch would probably love to go to a better team to finish his career, but there’s nothing else available.
“We talk about it (getting better), get the key people together, talk about what we need to do to make our company better, make the cars better,” Childress said.
“These guys have stepped up to the plate; everybody, John, I call him John K Klausmeier (RCR’s technical director)- I think that’s his last name, he’s doing the job for us. Chevy has a tech center, we’re working there. Effort is being put in for sure to change it and turn things around,” Childress declared.
Still, when the team owner isn’t sure of the technical director’s last name., you’ve got a problem. When you talk about changes but don’t really change anything, you’ve got a problem. When you’re putting in effort but you don’t know what you should be working on, you’ve got a problem.
RCR’s people may be stepping up to the plate, but they’re striking out. And RCR is not going to get better unless it brings in better people who have a better idea of what you need to do to win today. Because what worked for Dale Earnhardt won’t work now.
NASCAR NOTES
No race this week. Old Guy Sport does not count superspeedway races (Atlanta, Daytona, Talledega) because winning at those tracks is almost entirely dependent on luck and has little to do with how the driver or the team performs.
Last week’s OGS Richmond picks: 1-Chase Briscoe, 2-Denny Hamlin, 3-Kyle Larson. Richmond winner: Austin Dillon. OGS season record: 10-10.
OGS competition index top 10 after 21 races: 1-Hamlin 470 points, 2-Larson 366, 3-Briscoe 328, 4-William Byron 326, Christopher Bell 326, 6-Shane van Gisbergen 295, 7-Ryan Blaney 293, 8-Bubba Wallace 160, 9-Alex Bowman 158, 10-
Chase Elliott 147.